Month: September 2026

Survival of the Friendliest — Reading Notes

Central Thesis

The book challenges the conventional interpretation of “survival of the fittest.” Human evolutionary success did not come primarily from being stronger, more aggressive, or more ruthless than other species.

Instead, one of our greatest evolutionary advantages was friendliness: our exceptional capacity for social tolerance, cooperation, communication, and understanding other minds.

The central evolutionary chain can be summarized as:

friendliness / social tolerance
→ cooperative communication
→ larger and better-coordinated groups
→ sharing knowledge and innovations
→ more sophisticated culture and technology
→ human evolutionary success

But this same adaptation contains a paradox:

friendliness toward “us” can intensify hostility toward “them.”

The mechanisms that allow humans to form extraordinarily strong social bonds can also facilitate prejudice, dehumanization, and cruelty toward perceived outsiders.

Introduction — Friendliness as a Cognitive Superpower

The Jigsaw Classroom

During school desegregation in Austin in 1971, minority children such as Carlos entered classrooms where they could be mocked and marginalized. The conventional classroom structure could worsen the problem because students competed for the teacher’s approval; one student’s success could feel like another student’s loss.

The jigsaw method changed the social structure of learning.

Each student learned one part of a topic, and the students then had to combine their pieces to understand the whole. Success therefore required interdependence and cooperation rather than competition.

The important insight is that reducing hostility does not necessarily begin by persuading people to feel differently. Changing the structure of interaction can create cooperation, which in turn changes relationships.

Central idea

Friendliness, cooperation, and kindness should therefore be understood not simply as moral virtues but as cognitive and evolutionary capacities.

Humans survived and flourished partly because we became exceptionally good at working with other humans.

Continue reading “Survival of the Friendliest — Reading Notes”

回到故事的起點—心理催眠師La casa delle voci Review

!本文有劇透 spoiler alert!

創傷可以被選擇性遺忘嗎?

遺失的部分人生可以被重拾嗎?

童年的記憶、故事,這些真實和想像並存的敘事能不能構成我們的identity?

奇妙的敘事結構 — 鏡像

小說從一則心理催眠委託開始。住在佛羅倫斯的兒童心理學家Pietro Gerber接到來自澳洲同行的請求,接手Hanna Hall的催眠治療。這本身非常反常,因為Hanna是一個成年人,而Gerber的咨詢對象都是兒童。但同行以幫助Hanna內心的小女孩為理由說服了Gerber,因為Hanna希望通過催眠找回自己十歲時的記憶,有關自己殺了哥哥Ado的記憶。故事前半部Gerber擁有一個已知身分,確切的職業、家庭、社交和成就感;相對的,Hall則是模糊的,記憶、出身、工作、甚至情緒都很難定義。

故事看起來是Gerber通過專業催眠引導Hall慢慢找回和父母在各個“聲音之家”流浪的記憶。但每次催眠結束後,Gerber都覺得自己的現實生活和精神世界在被Hall漸漸侵入。無數的巧合:兒子腳踝上的鈴鐺;解決幽靈男孩case的童書;與父親B先生有關的歌曲;精神病院裡的照片等等。這些或真或假或巧合的細節逐漸在畫出Hall的身分,她不是濛昧的,她才是主導者,更是知情者,她才是讓Gerber入睡又醒來並看清自己人生的催眠師。

兩個人在故事推進的過程中進行了人物交換,一開始我們以為Gerber帶Hall進入催眠狀態,以期挖出丟失的記憶,到文末才發現是Hall幫Gerber重現自己被父親催眠封存的真相,並找到自己出生的秘密。Gerber從清晰到模糊對照Hall從模糊到清晰的兩條人物曲線設計得像照鏡子一般,對稱又迷離。

敘事/聲音的力量

整本小說中有很多“聲音”。聲音之家中媽媽驅邪的聲音,Hanna Hall反覆背誦的五個規則,B先生最後的遺言,大段的敘事來自Hall的催眠陳述。這些聲音構成了Gerber和Hall的自我。小孩子在沒有能力建立自己的敘事之前,就進入了他人聲音的房間,從父母那聽說的童年故事,他們訂下的規則,什麼是真的,什麼是危險的。

父母可能是世界上最安全的人,也可能是最危險的人。孩子們對自己的理解建立在別人告知的故事上,長大後不論是誰都要經歷再追尋再重塑的過程。Gerber的自我建立源自切斷和遺忘,Hall是牢記和追尋。最後遺失的人獲得丟失的人生故事,探求的人獲得了幫助別人的救贖。直面了各自故事的起源後,這段無法修復的創傷過往才不再是控制他們人生的幽靈,被看見被撫慰的過去會成為他們更堅實的自我身份的一部分。他們一起回到了共同的故事起點。

結局反而是有點悲傷的浪漫,並不驚悚。